Why All the Dead Stuff?
"Everything
natural from its origin is lifeless" DLW 164
Death. Decaying
stuff. Lifeless matter. These phrases tend to evoke a negative reaction because
we think dead=bad. But dead stuff is essential to our natural existence. For
example, dirt, which is composed of dead plant matter, is necessary for the
plant life that we live off of. Metal and plastic, which are in no way living,
are an integral part of our lives. Our bodies, and so our very natural lives, are
composed entirely of lifeless atoms. Even though all natural substances are lifeless,
they are necessary to our natural life. But why do we start with a natural life
at all? We could be born straight
into the spiritual world, and since all life comes from there, this lifeless,
natural world can seem pretty pointless. So what use does it serve? Why all the
dead stuff?
We
can assume the dead stuff serves a purpose, otherwise the Lord would not have
created it. To see why it was created, we need to look at the Lord’s goals. The
Lord created humanity so that He would have someone to love. For example, He
created Fred. Fred is a normal guy, and is part of the Lord’s goal in creation.
The Lord’s essence is love, so His very nature is to love Fred as someone
outside of Himself, for the sake of conjunction with him. Conjunction can only
happen if Fred reciprocates His love (DLW 47). To reciprocate love, Fred has to
have a certain degree autonomy. He has to be distinct from the Lord for the
Lord’s love to be realized. Fred also cannot have anything of the Divine
existing in him, because then the Lord would just be loving Himself, and love
of self is the opposite of real love (DLW 49). When we see all this, it is
clear that we cannot be created directly from Him because then all we would
have is His life, and we would be no different from Him, and He would just be
loving Himself. There would be no ‘us’, only the Lord, and there would be no
one for Him to love. To prevent this situation, Fred was created from
substances that are lifeless and therefore constant, but created such that the
Lord’s life ca n be received by him (DLW 4). All life comes from the Lord, but
if Fred was created from that life instead of a recipient of it, the Lord’s
infinite love would be pointless because there would be no one to receive it. Having
the natural world is imperative to the Lord because without it we could not be
distinct from Him.
Though
it is necessary to be distinct from the Lord, it is philosophically a strange
concept. He is the source of everything. He is present in and continually
sustaining every speck of existence, but somehow Fred was created as an
individual with free will. What makes Fred different from the Lord is that he
is finite. The fact that it is possible for an infinite Being to create from
Himself anything that is finite seems like a paradox. How can He squash down
His infinite nature to make something finite from it? Creation means making
something outside of Himself, and anything outside of Him is apart from
Infinity and therefore must be finite. Since He is love itself, and love can
only love others outside itself, the only option for His infinite power was to
create something finite. He could not create anything infinite because the
infinite is indivisible (DLW 49). Creation by definition is finite, and this
supplies distinction from Him.
We
can see how it is that finite creation makes people autonomous beings, so now
we must take a look at the process by which the Lord creates the natural
universe. For something to be finite, it must come to an end. Never ending is
the definition of infinite. The Writings describe the way creation terminates. Everything
is created from the spiritual sun because it is the first outflowing of the
Lord’s love and wisdom (DLW 154). The atmospheres radiating from the spiritual
sun gradually descend and decrease by discrete degrees, becoming more
“compressed and inert” until they stop radiating and rest in their final forms.
At this point they become the physical substances which make up the natural
universe (DLW 302). The fundamental principle of this process is that
everything receives Divine life by a discontinuous connection (DLW 56). Discontinuity
creates gaps in the life radiating from the Lord, making it possible for His
life to gradually cease, until His outflowing life reaches a state of
inactivity. It is as though the spiritual sun is a picture of the Lord, and the
first degree of life emanating out of it is a photocopy of that picture, and
each subsequent degree is a photocopy of the degree before it, until eventually
the picture gets so blurred that it no longer looks like the Lord. The natural
universe comes from the Lord but all of its contents are constant, fixed, and
lifeless. In this way it is largely insulated from the Lord’s will.
Now that there are
elements that are devoid of the Lord’s life in itself, Fred can be created as
an autonomous being. We were created after the substances of the natural world
(LJ 9), which supports the theory of evolution. One explanation of the origin
of life is that amino acids, the building blocks of protein, were created from
chance events of inorganic molecules, in the right conditions, being struck by
lightning.[1]
Once the building blocks of life were created, it would just take a bunch more
chance events (aka: Divine providence) and a few billion years, and, voilà: people exist! This natural process illustrates how it is possible for Fred
to be created from substances outside the Lord (but still ultimately from Him).
Fred has a lifeless component, which makes him so drastically different from
the Lord that he is an autonomous being.
The
creation of beings outside the Lord accomplishes part of the His goal, but we
need to be able to love the Lord in return for it to mean anything. Loving
someone has to be a free choice, otherwise it is slavery, not love. Without spiritual
freedom, Fred has no way of reciprocally joining Himself to the Lord (TCR 845).
Spiritual freedom is simply the ability to do what is good and true (DLW 240).
In theory, this should not be hard. The Lord is constantly flowing into Fred
with His good and truth, so it should be easy for him to choose to act from
them. That does not seem very free, though. Is he not just a brainwashed puppet
doing what the Lord tells him to? Well, to really be able to choose what is
good and true, Fred has to have the option to choose something else. There is
no choice if he only has option A.
Fred needs to have
an option B in order to be free, and this option comes from having a sense of
self. Even though it seems like we should not be able to choose something other
than the Lord (the source of all being), choosing Him is only real if we have
the option to choose something else. Option B is simply the option to not do
what the Lord wants. We are only led by the Lord if we choose to follow
heavenly loves, but we are led by love of self if we choose to follow our
proprium, which is entirely evil (TCR 400). We have a choice between our proprium
(evil), and the Lord. Out proprium is just a sense of self, which comes from
being created into the natural world (DP 219). We are surrounded by
lifelessness, and because that is all we can see, there is no way for us to
truly believe that our life comes from the Lord, so we have the sense that our
life is our own. This creates something higher and something lower—self and the
Lord—that we can choose between. The necessity of the choice between higher or
lower things explains why equilibrium between heaven and hell is so important,
and why our freedom is dependent on it (TCR 477). If that equilibrium were
completely destroyed, Fred would not be able to return the Lord’s love and so
the Lord could not achieve conjunction with him. The natural world makes it
possible to be born with a sense of self and thereby have freedom.
We
are free to choose the higher things that conjoin us to the Lord because we
start with things from the natural world. Fred was born into the natural world
where he started with the lowest things so that it is possible for him to
advance into higher things (DP 220). If he started with any good from the Lord
attached to and defining his life he would be controlled by that predetermined
quality.[2]
The lowest things that Fred started with are the goods and truths that are
associated with the bodily senses (AC 3691). The physical world around him is
lifeless so it does not exercise any influence on him. It is like a toy that he
can play with, and how he reacts to it is what matters. He can choose to make
it serve him, or to figure out how to serve others with it. When he uses the
lowest things for good, the Lord flows into him with good loves, raising him up
to higher things. In this fashion he ascends from lowest things to higher
things, like climbing up a ladder, step by step (AC 3701). If we decide to work
our way up the ladder, we are working towards heavenly loves. This fundamental
choice of whether or not to choose good is one that can only be made in the
natural world. The natural level of Fred’s mind actually has the most freedom,
because it gets to choose whether or not to make the good flowing in from
heaven part of his life (AC 3043:2). This is why the natural world is so
important. It allows Fred to have eternal conjunction with the Lord in heaven,
by choosing that life for himself. Whether we go to heaven or hell is based on
the quality of his dominant love, and this love cannot change after he die
because it is his very being (TCR 399). He can change this on earth, and so
natural life is a relatively short trial to see if he will make something
outside himself higher than his own desires, even though his evil nature would
have him do otherwise. If he did not start with the lowest things, he could not
freely choose prioritize the Lord’s good.
The
natural world gives Fred externals, and this is how he can change his dominant
love. But since his dominant love is his very being, how can he choose to do
something that goes against it? Changing our dominant love from good to evil is
profanation and is rare, but changing it from evil to good is the task we all
have. The first step for Fred to become a good person is rejecting evil, but
this has to happen in his internal self (TCR 437). Only the Lord knows anything
about the countless elements in his internal self (DP 120), so that seems like
a hopeless endeavor—he cannot see his internals so how is he supposed to see
what is good and what is evil and know what to reject? It is imperative that Fred
cannot see his internals. Because he starts with lowest things and has to work his
way up to higher things, he would have no desire to remove the evil things in himself.
He would see evils as his being and want to protect them. For this reason, only
the Lord sees our internals and only He can act on them. However, He can only
remove our evils if we decide to resist them in our external self (DP 119). The
action of Fred’s body is an expression of his internal and external self (DP
103), so it is through this that he has influence over his dominant loves. The
external actions that he does can happen apart from what his loves want him to
do. He may dislike resisting evils, such as apologizing to people or not saying
spiteful comments, but if he does it the Lord can change his spirit. When he
removes evils in his actions the Lord removes countless evils in his soul (DP
119). This process cannot happen in the spiritual world. When people die they
leave their externals behind with their bodies, so people in the spiritual
world act from their internals (AC 3489). There is no part of them that can be
anything other than what their loves are. The lifelessness of the natural world
allows for our externals to be different from the life of our internals.
Though
it is necessary to start with, Fred’s natural body has a shelf life. Through
death, he has to lose the lower natural elements he thinks of as himself in
order to receive the spiritual and eternal elements he was made to receive (DP
220). The natural world is lifeless, so it is limiting. But it is these limits
that allow Fred to have life at all. The natural world gives him the ability to
freely choose heaven. It allows him to make higher goods and truths part of his
life. It allows him to have being that is distinct from the Lord’s, and
therefore to receive the Lord’s love if he chooses to reciprocate it. And even
after death Fred needs the natural world in order to keep being a person. When
he becomes an angel, Fred still retains the purer substances of the natural
world, because without it he would lose connection to creation (DP 220).
Without connection to creation Fred could not receive the love and wisdom from which
the Lord gives life. From beginning to end, and then into eternity, this
lifeless world allows us to have life.
3 comments:
What a paper. You did a very thorough and systematic job of describing a very lofty process. I thought your simply use of "Fred" gave some grounding that kept the ideas in line without distracting from the points you were making. At the end of each paragraph I had a "but that doesn't explain x" thought in my head, which was consistently the topic of the next paragraph. Through this prediction of my thought process, I felt competently led through your topic of discussion. Great job.
I thought your paper was solid excluding the introduction and conclusion. At the end of your introduction, I felt lost as to where exactly this paper was going to take me. Luckily you made up for this somewhat by having a well structured body of the paper. But then I got to your conclusion paragraph. I thought that bringing up how angels need the natural world for the first time in your conclusion was a mistake. I felt unsatisfied with this explanation, especially with the use of the unexplained "purer substances of the natural world." I think this paper should have had another paragraph before the conclusion, or this topic should have been left out completely.
Going off of what is written above, the questions prompted by my paper is obvious. What are these pure substances of the natural world? How do angels actually make contact with the natural world? The introduction of this concept in your conclusion sent many questions spinning through my mind.
Overall, great paper. Work on using introduction for paper clarity and conclusion to restate and show implications, not introduce another concept needed in depth explanation.
You did a great job of laying out the importance of being born in the natural world. Your explanation of this was clear and thorough. I liked the way you set up the issue of how God can create finite things from himself. I laughed because "How can He squash down His infinite nature to make something finite from it?" captured my thoughts about it pretty accurately.
Like Richard, I felt that the conclusion brought in ideas that either shouldn't have been there or should have been discussed earlier. Based on your presentations, I expected you to go more into the material you hinted at in the conclusion, and I was really curious about that stuff. Maybe you could have compressed the topic of why we have to be born in the natural world, and then added in more about the relationship between heaven and the natural.
What is the connection between heaven and the physical? We know it's a foundation, but how does that really work? That's what I'd like to know
Okay these are jumbled because I wrote them on my phone as I read, but here you go:
I really like the photo copy metaphor! That was a great visual--it really cleared that up in my mind.
I also really like Fred--he brings a needed comic element to the paper. Fred is relaxing. I like Fred.
I'm confused about how if Fred were created from Life and not just recipient of it the Lord's love would be pointless. Do you mean if he was created from it as in a little piece broken off and reshaped? Because then I do get it.
Like phrase "insulated from the Lord's will"
The more I read, the more I feel how nothing and evil we are (Freya's paper lol). Do we have to be opposite of God to be lovable? <-- my question. Because we aren't really lovable, but we become it, but what about in the meantime?
This paper has a lot to say and provides much to think about--I do think that it works almost exclusively on the intellectual plane, and this threatens to lose an audience's interest. You really wrote quite a thoughtful paper, but my criticism is thhat it needs a step back every so often, to consider heart stuff over head stuff. You are a clear, orderly writer with a very informative paper! It would aid your cause to switch up the sentence format, to keep the much-deserved interest.
Post a Comment