“How Freedom fixed it all.”
DJ Mulhern
“He is then
moved by the Lord nearer to the east and at the same time to the south in the
spiritual world, and brought into heavenly freedom, which is true freedom.”
(TCR 478)
In this research project we will be
looking into how big of a role freedom and rationality play in determining how
we get to heaven. We will dive into how the Most Ancient Church did not have
the same freedom we have now, and how that affected them. Also, we will address
the questions, is it better to have freedom or not have it? Is freedom
necessary in order to get into heaven? Finally, we will determine how freedom
effects our judgement in the end, be it for heaven or hell, and how, before
freedom, this could not have happened.
First, it is
important to tie down our definition of freedom and rationality: let’s look at
the dictionary definition and compare it to the Swedenborg definition. Freedom:
the power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants without hindrance
or restraint. (Dictionary) Rationality: the quality of being based on or in
accordance with reason or logic. (Dictionary) For the Swendenborg definition of
both, we can look to Divine Love and Wisdom for the definitions: “By rationality, I mean the ability to
discern what is true and therefore what is false, and to discern what is good
and therefore what is evil. By freedom, I mean the ability freely to think,
intend, and to do such things” (Divine love and wisdom #264). We can see that
Swedenborg definitions are similar to the dictionary definitions, which help us
solidify our context for this paper. Now that we have these locked down, we can
actually get into how freedom and rationality play an important role in getting
us into heaven.
Let us start
by looking at the freedom the people of the Most Ancient Church had by looking
at the Writings of Swedenborg. “That 'a help suitable for him' means the
proprium becomes clear from the nature of the proprium, and from what follows.
But because the member of the Church dealt with here was inherently
well-disposed, he was granted a proprium. But it [only] appeared to be his own,
which is why it is called a help suitable for him” (Arcana Coelestia 140). From
this reading, we can take that God gave the people of the Most Ancient Church a
proprium to think as their own, but really it wasn’t their own. God did this in
order to please man and bring the human race closer to God. The Most Ancient Church
had a united will and intellect. The Most Ancient Church acted according to
reason, as opposed to from freedom according to reason, which we know is how we
act now. “It has been stated and shown above that this appearance has been
granted to man in order that he may act from freedom according to reason, thus
as of himself and not let his hands hang down and wait for influx”(DP 200). God
needed to separate the will and intellect and therefore he made the propium.
They had freedom, but not like how we do now. They had perception which meant
they could see truth from love. They did not know what true freedom and
rationality was because they were so close to God, and therefore could only be
facing toward him or turned away from him. This situation led to the creation
of very evil people called Nephilim and brought about the Flood in order to
wipe out both Nephilim and perception. By wiping the evil out, God let freedom
and rationality become more important, pushing us further away from God and
giving us the ability to choose if we want to go closer to him or not. The
people of the Most Ancient Church did not have freedom and rationality; they
were too close to God to truly have them. It was like the Most Ancient Church
was God’s control group that did not work out.
The question,
“was it better to not have freedom or to have freedom is an interesting
addendum. When God gave us more freedom, He allowed for us to become even
closer to HIm and to be a better neighbor to Him. So, therefore, having freedom
is better if you are looking at it from God’s perspective. “Hence it is that
the Lord by His Divine Providence continually leads man in freedom, and the
freedom appears to him to be none other than his own; and to lead man in
freedom in opposition to himself is like lifting up a heavy and resisting
weight from the ground by means of screws, through the power of which the
weight and the resistance are not felt; or it is like what happens to a man in
the company of an enemy who intends to kill him, an intention he is not aware
of; and a friend leads him away by unknown paths and afterwards discloses to
him his enemy's intention”(DP 211). This quote explains to us why God gave us
freedom; He does not wish to have a hand in what decisions we make. This protected our freedom, but inevitably
made it truly made a lot harder for us to get into heaven. We lost our
perception. Imagine being able to perceive truth from love and being able to
have a united will and intellect. It might have been cool to experience. You
would not fear death or anything. You would have the full understanding of how
life works. But you can’t. Having this
knowledge would corrupt you because you would become evil, which would then
lead you down to hell. Thank God He separated will and intellect. Having will
and intellect unseparated would make you believe you are God which is the worst
thing possible. Having freedom allows for us to decide whether or not we want
to be a neighbor to God. We can, make this decision without seeing everything,
which is better because if we could see everything, we would be corrupted. This
is vividly demonstrated from the Most Ancient Church.
Is it
necessary that we needed freedom in order to get into heaven? Well, if we did
not have freedom, we would not be able to move closer or further away from God.
It is not necessarily needed to get into heaven, it just moves us closer or not
to God. Freedom is just the tool God gave us in order to fully become neighbors
to Him. If freedom was not available, we would have no way of getting closer to
God, since we would already have our spot set and that would be that.
So where did the people of the most
ancient church go to? Heaven or hell? Well, if they did die I would say they
had their spot set already since they did not have the freedom that we do now.
This is yet another example of why freedom is so important. In TCR, Swedenborg
also describes heavenly placement
“like a body in motion,
which travels so long as it has any energy, and comes to rest when its energy
is exhausted. So too it is with the freedom man's will enjoys; both of these,
freedom of choice and will, can in man be called active energy, for if the will
ceases to operate, so does the power to act, and if freedom of choice ceases to
operate, so does the will” (TCR 482). If we do not have freedom, we would lose
our will as well. This shows just how important freedom is for all of us. We
can see freedom and the will are hand in hand through this passage. For when we
die now, we will be judged on our actions and what we are willing to throw away
from ourselves. If our freedom was taken away, Swedenborg states, “it would be,
to use a comparison, like taking the wheels away from a machine, the arms that
catch the wind from a mill, or the sails from a ship. In fact, it would be like
a man parting with his spirit when he dies; for the life of man's spirit
consists in his free will in spiritual matters. The angels groan at the mere
mention of the fact that this free will is denied by many ministers of the
church at the present time; they call this denial madness on top of madness”
(TCR 482). To not have freedom would be madness and lead us to absolute madness!
This is made vividly clear in the readings about the Most Ancient Church. It
was the embodiment of insanity during that time, and evil was able to grow
without anything resisting it. Freedom is essential for us and is most
certainly necessary for us to get to heaven, else we risk becoming a part of
chaos.
How does
freedom affect our judgment? Let’s start answering this by looking at a quote
from TCR: “The reason why anything freely accepted by a person lasts with him
is that freedom has to do with his will; and if so, it also has to do with his
love. It has been shown elsewhere [397] that the will is a receiver for love.
Anyone can understand that all freedom has to do with love, and also with the
will, when people say, 'I want this because I love it', and conversely, 'I love
this, so I want it'”(TCR 493). What this quote is saying is that freedom is
tied to your will, which is then tied to your ruling love. Your ruling love is
what you are judged on in the spiritual world, and because of this, and the
previous reasonings, freedom plays a key role into you being able to shape your
ruling love, whether it be good or evil. “Any freedom coming from the Lord is
real freedom; but any that comes from hell and makes itself at home with a
person is slavery. Still spiritual freedom must inevitably seem like slavery to
anyone who enjoys the freedom of hell, since they are opposites. Yet all who
enjoy spiritual freedom not only know but feel that the freedom of hell is
slavery” (TCR 495). Freedom is interpreted by us, but is always given to us by
the Lord. It is up to us how we want to receive this Freedom, good or evil. Therefore,
we are judged by freedom and how we take it. If we choose to love evil then we
choose eternal slavery. If we choose to love good, then we choose true freedom
and become closer to God. We can see how by not having freedom, and the chaos
that followed, God chose to reboot us through the judgement of the Most Ancient
Church. God needed the flood in order to wipe out perception and falsity.
Therefore the united will and intellect will never happen again. We gain
spiritual freedom and are able to choose between good and evil. This is how
freedom affected judgment: it allowed for us to become more fluid in our
self-adaptation and to move closer or further away from God.
We can
conclude from this research that freedom was a pivotal tool in the judgement of
humanity. Also, freedom was needed in order to bring us closer to God while
becoming better neighbors to God. If we didn’t have freedom, we would go mad.
Therefore God gave us the propium, which led to us having freedom and
separating the will and intellect. What was wrong with the Most Ancient Church?
They did not have freedom or a separated will and intellect. Finally, freedom
helps us find our true love and choose between good or evil.
4 comments:
I really like the premise of your paper, that freedom and rationality was a fix of the first version of humans in the most ancient church. I liked the way you expressed that we have freedom, but we get to interpret it. I hadn't thought of it quite this way before, but I like how it expresses that freedom is what we make it even while we are not the source of our freedom.
You said that we don't need freedom to get to heaven, but only to move closer or farther from God. It seems to me that moving closer to God is moving toward or into Heaven, while moving farther away from God is moving toward, or into Hell, so I'm not sure why you'd say freedom isn't needed to go to Heaven.
If the people of the Most Ancient Church really did have their places in the afterlife set, do you think they ended up in heaven or Hell?
This paper is an effective breakdown of the course material from the third unit and how freedom relates to the Most Ancient Church. You kept it clean and simple, staying on track through an assignment that is almost tailor-made for tangents and side stories. Good job making a point and sticking with it.
One of the bases for your argument is that the Most Ancient Church did not have freedom. I agree that a person not separated from God is indeed not free, but wouldn't the fact that the people of the Most Ancient Church were entities separate from God mean that they were, at some basic level, free? How would you describe them, if not free? I'm curious to see how this one pans out.
I think this was a good look at the relationship between human freedom and evil. I think there is an interesting balance in the New Church between one's focus on God, Evil, and Freedom. I appreciated your take, as my paper touched on this balance from the perspective of evil. I want to know if you think God created evil to provide freedom, or if the freedom God provided caused evil's creation?
DJ,
I enjoyed reading your breakdown of this topic. I find the Most Ancient Church really interesting and I'm glad you cleared some things up for me. I think you did a great job explaining how in order to have more freedom we had to be separated from God. If you were to tell someone this who has no knowledge of Swedenborg's writings they would probably think you're crazy. But you had plenty of examples to support this.
My question is do you think people of strict religions believe they are free, or do you think that they believe sacrificing their freedom is a part of their duty?
Post a Comment