Stop Freaking Out About
Proprium and Read My Paper
by, Brandy Rose
We all know that we have God-given
freedom to be a good person, even though it is sometimes difficult. Our default
setting is our natural, evil proprium, which does its best to govern the
choices we make. We have the potential to be good people, but if our proprium,
which inclines us toward evil is at our core, then how can we make good
decisions? What decisions should we make when we are not necessarily dealing
with a moral issue? What in our mind should we listen to? Why is it hard to
know what the Lord wants? Can we ever trust ourselves to do the right thing? Having
proprium does not trap us in always doing evil things from self-love; our
proprium is a gift if we use it correctly.
Before tackling the issue of proprium and
freedom, we should cover some basic definitions. There are three spiritual
players in our lives: freedom, rationality, and proprium. People act from
thought in freedom—it is called having agency, putting freedom and rationality
together (DP 78). Proprium is the attribute that allows us to feel life from
ourselves, and agency is the attribute that allows us to act as if from
ourselves. While people are always acting from agency and proprium together, in
many of the decisions we make we do wrestle with which one we will favor. Sometimes
what our proprium wants is something we know we should not do. Agency and
proprium are what make us human, and they are wound tightly together, making
distinction difficult. The issue is which one we will consciously let guide us:
our sense of freedom and self (proprium), or our sense of freedom and power
over self (agency)? The Lord gave us proprium to feel life from ourselves, but
if it is evil, how do we get out of it? Is agency the key?
We all know how school feels. No one
wants to do homework, but a good student will compel themselves to do it
anyway. Sometimes it is easy to make yourself do homework. Perhaps it is the middle
of the day; all of your friends are at work or in class—you are not missing any
fun. But what about on a Saturday night when you are trying to buckle down and
work. Meanwhile, you are texting back and forth with your friend who is
currently out with your group having a good time. Now, this may not be a moral
issue, but that almost makes it more difficult—that means that you cannot just
rely on doing good over evil because neither choice is obviously good or evil.
Are you going skip working to go out with your friends, or are you going to catch
up on your work so you can have a more relaxing week?
Your proprium is always telling us
to do what it loves, because having what it loves gives it life (DP 78). You
have a dominant love in your mind called your ruling love, but you never know
exactly what it is. It sits in the highest region of your mind, waiting to be
fed, taking whatever is useful to it (TCR 494). If what is useful to it is to
hang out with your friends instead of doing homework, then that is what we will
be driven to do. Your proprium, or self-love, wants to feed itself. The
gratification of socializing with your friends would provide an easy, immediate
delight; in other words, you know you like hanging out with your friends,
whereas with homework, the outcome may not provide that sense of delight and
gratification. The enjoyment of self-love constitutes our life; the enjoyment
we get out of doing what we want is an enjoyment of freedom (DP 186). So, if
hanging out with your friends is what you want, then it sounds like that is
what you will do, since you are driven by proprium. But there are two parts of
you here: one is thinking it might be a better idea to continue doing homework
to maintain balance in your academic life and be a useful student, while the
other is thinking, “No you want to
hang out with your friends, so that’s what you should do.” Will good come from
one and evil from the other? Is there spiritual merit in being responsible? Is
hanging out with your friends the wrong choice just because it is seemingly
what your proprium wants?
These are the kind of issues that
raise a lot of concern about the proprium. The case we are discussing is not moral;
you would not be a bad person if you decided to hang out with your friends
instead of doing homework. Is there a right decision then? Which mode of
thought should win, interior or exterior? The right decision will most likely
be to follow what your internal thought is trying to tell you. When internal
fights against external, often it is the internal trying to do good, and the
external bad (DP 145). The big question is: what will you appropriate to yourself
in this decision? Anything you do in freedom is done from your proprium and
thus appropriated to the self (DP 78). In other words, your proprium takes
things to itself to give itself shape. How will the homework decision affect
your proprium?
Here is the problem: you were born
into a hellish proprium which means you have evil tendencies (NJHD 145). From
this you could conclude that you cannot ever trust what you want because what
you want is from your proprium and your proprium is evil. It is a logical
conclusion, but it is wrong. Everything you do, you do in freedom—while it
appears as if from proprium (NJHD 141). Now, freedom can look like slavery. Looking
at heavenly freedom from a hellish standpoint makes heavenly freedom look like
slavery, while looking at hellish freedom from a heavenly standpoint makes
hellish freedom look like slavery (TCR 495). If you are immersed in the idea
that hanging out with your friends will be more fun than homework, then doing
your homework will look like slavery. But if you blow off your homework, will
hanging out with your friends be fun, or will you be in the slavery of worrying
about your homework? As both can feel like slavery, both can feel like freedom,
depending on which one you are immersed in (DP 43). Nevertheless, one is wrong.
Two opposite freedoms cannot both be right (DP 43). Even though you are born
with a hellish proprium, you can bring yourself into heavenly freedom because
you are held in equilibrium between heaven and hell at all times (LJ 33). So, a
useful question to ask in the homework situation is: what decision is harder to
make? Which decision will require self-compulsion?
You are born with a hellish proprium,
but into equilibrium so that you can have freedom (HH 293). This freedom is
essential to our humanity. In equilibrium, you can use your agency to
appropriate and produce; that is what makes you an agent and recipient of life
from the Lord (AE 1138). You shape the way you are by how you receive the Lord;
you can turn toward yourself or toward Him (TCR 491). You must compel yourself
though, however difficult it is—Divine Providence requires that every single
one of your actions must feel like it is coming from you (AE 1138). When there
is a pull between heavenly or hellish freedom, you must decide what to act on.
Your rationality begins the struggle by questioning what you want, and then
your freedom allows you to pursue it; that is how self-compulsion works (DP
145). True rationality and true freedom exist when we compel ourselves to do
the Lord’s will (DP 145).
Why do we have to compel ourselves? Why
does Divine Providence require that? Divine love, which is the Lord’s Essence,
wants what It has to belong to people. If people did not perceive His love,
thus life, as though it were their own then they could not conjoin with him (AE
1138). That is intrinsic in love’s function: you cannot give love if you do not
feel like it belongs to you. Further, if you did not have proprium, or the perception
of life from self, then you would have no purpose (AE 1138). The purpose of
proprium is to sustain itself, so if you did not have one, you would have no
compulsion to do anything. Your love is your purpose, and the reason you act is
the delight of that love (AE 1138). To have real life, people need the delight
of receiving, appropriating, and producing. (AE 1138). Divine love delights in
giving what it has to people, while people delight in feeling that love from themselves.
The key is to compel yourself to follow (and thus receive) good loves from the
Lord so that there is a reciprocal relationship between His love and yours—Divine
love loves you, and you grow to love it. It is a difficult concept to grasp.
Even spirits who have already passed into the next life torment themselves
because no good comes from them (AC 2891). Objectively, your proprium might
look lifeless if nothing comes from it, but the Lord can give it life if you
will it (AC 149).
The Lord alone has Proprium; He has the Proprium. His Proprium is His Divine
love which is life, and that life can be in you if you choose it (AC 149). You
can gain a heavenly proprium when acting on heavenly freedom (NJHD 145). By
compelling yourself and letting your good interior thought prevail over your
bad exterior thought, you can have enjoyment of good (DP 145). It continues to
be hard to know what the right thing is to do sometimes, but the key is to
remember the Lord and humble yourself to Him by putting His purpose above your
concern about your life. While you live under the appearance that you are alive
from yourself, the Lord is always leading you invisibly and silently—He is
always inviting you to Him (DP 186). When you take some time to reflect on what
the Lord does in your life and what He provides for you, it removes you from
your proprium so that He can be with you (AE 77). As you humble yourself to Him
and strive to obey His Word, your union with Him will strengthen your freedom,
and thus enrich your life (DP 43).
Circling back to our first issue
between hanging out with friends and doing homework: there is not really a
righteous decision. I was in the homework situation, and I chose my homework
over my friends. It was miserable, but I think it was a good decision for me—I
think it was my internal thought prevailing over my external thought, which is
what useful good self-compulsion looks like. Instead of slaving over doing the
“right” thing, I looked to the Lord and just made a decision. However, I think
I could have made a different decision and it would not have necessarily been
bad. More important than making sure every little decision you make is the
“right” one, is to practice looking generally toward the Lord in everything you
do, and so gradually orient yourself to Him. Humility is key. Look to the Lord
for guidance in your life. When you are getting caught up in some decision, step
out of your immersion in yourself and your life, and humble yourself before the
Lord—there are bigger things than the little concerns you get yourself caught
up in (Doctrine of Proprium Ch. VI). Making decisions will feel easier if you
shift focus from being perfect to being good (enough).
The Lord gave people proprium in order to
enjoy the delight of Divine love. It is hard to feel like a good person
sometimes because we get swept up in our sense of self, but we can always
return to what the Lord wants. If we want what the Lord wants then we tap into
a never-ending supply of delight, and that is the motivation behind human life:
feeling desire, taking action, feeling delight (Doctrine of Proprium, Ch. VI). Sometimes
we will learn the hard way what makes us truly happy and what does not—but
that’s life. People are prone to error; the Lord is not. There is no need to
resist the feeling life from yourself or wanting things for yourself. The Lord
gifted you that ability for His purpose. You have proprium, thus you have
freedom. You have freedom, thus you can compel yourself. You can compel
yourself away from evil and thus grow closer to the Lord. You do this by
recognizing and shunning proprium’s evil tendencies which turns you toward the
Lord. And when that path is unclear, you can always step back and remember the
Lord. The key truth to remember is that the Lord has created us for reciprocal
conjunction with Him—He has created us to receive the blessedness of His Life. “[W]hile
man by acknowledgement and faith from love as from himself, ascribes to the
Lord everything belonging to life, the Lord, on the other hand, ascribes to him
the good of his life, which is attended with every satisfaction and
blessedness” (AE 1138).
5 comments:
Thanks for this paper, Brandy! I loved the "calm-downishness" of it. That freaking out feeling can be totally relatable, so I'm glad you addressed this.
I loved your definition of proprium and agency "our sense of freedom and self (proprium), or our sense of freedom and power over self (agency)" contrasting them as self and power over self really sets up the idea that agency can help us triumph over our proprium when it's leading us astray.
I think I disagree with the idea that in looking to the Lord you will always end up with the answer that you should practice self-compulsion. Looking to the Lord requires that you subordinate your goals to His goals. In a non-moral situation like this, you could come up with the idea that the way to best serve your neighbor is to hang out with friends. That would be subordinating your goals of getting the paper done for a good grade, to His goals of serving the neighbor. Again, it is such a tough decision when it's not a moral dilemma because there is good and bad in both. And still, I agree with your claim that practicing self-compulsion is a useful endeavor that sets you up for triumph over evil in the future.
Now, do you think that there comes a point when self-compulsion is harmful? Can it direct you away from doing good, or is it always the right choice because it sets you up to triumph over evil during times of temptation? Things to consider, I don't know the answer.
Anyway, thanks for an informative and useful paper. You're a superstar.
Fun paper. I think the title is a great intro, it really drew me in and then blew me away with a serious tone that the title didn't really hint at.
A thought occurs. "When you take some time to reflect on what the Lord does in your life and what He provides for you, it removes you from your proprium so that He can be with you." So there is clearly some need for some reflection, but I want to know if you have any suggestions as to the frequency of this reflection. The constant looking back on all the things God does for seems like it would be very cumbersome if it was every moment of every day, so obviously it can't be that, or it would detract from being useful. Obviously, you don't want to thank that Lord on your deathbed, but never before. How often should you reflect?
Like many things, I was set on edge by one statement in particular "More important than making sure every little decision you make is the “right” one, is to practice looking generally toward the Lord in everything you do" Although I don't think you are necessarily wrong, the tone I interpreted from this was a "no worries, just do stuff and either way, it can't be too bad." kind of tone that I am wary of. Was this, or something similar the intended tone, or I am reading into it too much (or not enough)?
There is some impressive thought in this paper. I now have a better understanding of how agency affects our decision making, and how we can use this understanding to make decisions that will increase our happiness.
You imply in your paper that there are situations when there is no right answer, but I think there is always a right choice and wrong choice, even though we may not know it.
If we should be letting our internal thought guide our decision making, how do distinguish internal thought from external thought in order to do this?
You wrote an intriguing paper Brandy. It did a great job of identifying and explaining an idea many people struggle to understand.
You did a masterful job of building up the topic from a minor example to life-altering ideas and then considered how those ideas affected that the little choice from the beginning. It really helped to ground the paper topic in ordinary events before explaining the spiritual concepts behind it. I also liked how you considered equilibrium as a counterbalance to our proprium. It is certainly a fascinating dynamic between the two of them. I was also quite interested by the idea of getting a heavenly proprium. It is not a common idea that our proprium changes at all, let alone becomes heavenly.
Now when we gain a heavenly proprium does that change our old proprium? Is a heavenly proprium merely an adoption of an infinitely small portion of the Lord's proprium?
I also wonder if it's even possible for a collective proprium for heaven and hell. Is there an equivalent of a proprium for the Grand Man, would that be the Lord's propium or the angels' collectively? And if that's the case does that mean the proprium for the Grand Monster is a horrible thing from everyone in hell and on earth?
That was really fun to read thank you, Brandy!
Post a Comment